• Login/Register
  • Section: Internet /Monday 13th October 2014

    Alphabetic Index : A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

    Search β):

    * SOAP *

    Simple Object Access Protocol - SOAP

    پروتکل دسترسی آسان به اشیاء ، سُوپ


    Iranian_Flag_Hand_Love_Heart.jpg
    (Wikipedia) - SOAP This article is about the computer network protocol. For other uses, see Soap (disambiguation).
    This article''s lead section may not adequately summarize key points of its contents. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (June 2012)

    SOAP, originally defined as Simple Object Access protocol, is a protocol specification for exchanging structured information in the implementation of web services in computer networks. It relies on XML Information Set for its message format, and usually relies on other application layer protocols, most notably Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) or Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), for message negotiation and transmission.

    Contents

    Characteristics

    SOAP can form the foundation layer of a web services protocol stack, providing a basic messaging framework for web services. This XML-based protocol consists of three parts:

    SOAP has three major characteristics:

  • extensibility (security and WS-routing are among the extensions under development)
  • neutrality (SOAP can operate over any transport protocol such as HTTP, SMTP, TCP, UDP, or JMS)
  • independence (SOAP allows for any programming model)
  • As an example of what SOAP procedures can do, an application can send a SOAP message to a server that has web services enabled—such as a real-estate price database—with the parameters for a search. The server then returns an XML-formatted document with the resulting data, e.g., prices, location, features. Since the generated data comes in a standardized machine-parsable format, the requesting application can then integrate it directly.

    The SOAP architecture consists of several layers of specifications for:

    SOAP evolved as a successor of XML-RPC, though it borrows its transport and interaction neutrality and the envelope/header/body from elsewhere (probably from WDDX).

    History

    SOAP was designed as an object-access protocol in 1998 by Dave Winer, Don Box, Bob Atkinson, and Mohsen Al-Ghosein for Microsoft, where Atkinson and Al-Ghosein were working at the time. The SOAP specification is currently maintained by the XML Protocol Working Group of the World Wide Web Consortium.

    SOAP originally stood for "Simple Object Access Protocol" but version 1.2 of the standard dropped this acronym. Version 1.2 became a W3C recommendation on June 24, 2003.

    After SOAP was first introduced, it became the underlying layer of a more complex set of Web Services, based on Web Services Description Language (WSDL) and Universal Description Discovery and Integration (UDDI). These services, especially UDDI, have proved to be of far less interest, but an appreciation of them gives a more complete understanding of the expected role of SOAP compared to how web services have actually evolved.

    SpecificationSOAP structure

    The SOAP specification defines the messaging framework, which consists of:

    Processing model

    The SOAP processing model describes a distributed processing model, its participants, the SOAP nodes, and how a SOAP receiver processes a SOAP message. The following SOAP nodes are defined:

    SOAP Building Blocks

    A SOAP message is an ordinary XML document containing the following elements:

    Element Description Required
    Envelope Identifies the XML document as a SOAP message. Yes
    Header Contains header information. No
    Body Contains call, and response information. Yes
    Fault Provides information about errors that occurred while processing the message. No
    Transport methods

    Both SMTP and HTTP are valid application layer protocols used as transport for SOAP, but HTTP has gained wider acceptance as it works well with today''s internet infrastructure; specifically, HTTP works well with network firewalls. SOAP may also be used over HTTPS (which is the same protocol as HTTP at the application level, but uses an encrypted transport protocol underneath) with either simple or mutual authentication; this is the advocated WS-I method to provide web service security as stated in the WS-I Basic Profile 1.1.

    This is a major advantage over other distributed protocols like GIOP/IIOP or DCOM, which are normally filtered by firewalls. SOAP over AMQP is yet another possibility that some implementations support. SOAP also has an advantage over DCOM that it is unaffected by security rights configured on the machines that require knowledge of both transmitting and receiving nodes. This let SOAP be loosely coupled in a way that is not possible with DCOM. There is also the SOAP-over-UDP OASIS standard.

    Message format

    XML Information Set was chosen as the standard message format because of its widespread use by major corporations and open source development efforts. Typically, XML Information Set is serialized as XML. A wide variety of freely available tools significantly eases the transition to a SOAP-based implementation. The somewhat lengthy syntax of XML can be both a benefit and a drawback. While it promotes readability for humans, facilitates error detection, and avoids interoperability problems such as byte-order (endianness), it can slow processing speed and can be cumbersome. For example, CORBA, GIOP, ICE, and DCOM use much shorter, binary message formats. On the other hand, hardware appliances are available to accelerate processing of XML messages. Binary XML is also being explored as a means for streamlining the throughput requirements of XML. XML messages by their self-documenting nature usually have more ''overhead'' (Headers, footers, nested tags, delimiters) than actual data in contrast to earlier protocols where the overhead was usually a relatively small percentage of the overall message.

    In financial messaging SOAP was found to result in a 2–4 times larger message than previous protocols FIX (Financial Information Exchange) and CDR (Common Data Representation).

    XML Information Set does not have to be serialized in XML. For instance, a CSV or JSON XML-infoset representation exists. There is also no need to specify a generic transformation framework. The concept of SOAP bindings allows for specific bindings for a specific application. The drawback is that both the senders and receivers have to support this newly defined binding.

    Example messagePOST /InStock HTTP/1.1 Host: www.example.org Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset=utf-8 Content-Length: 299 SOAPAction: "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" <?xml version="1.0"?> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"> <soap:Header> </soap:Header> <soap:Body> <m:GetStockPrice xmlns:m="http://www.example.org/stock"> <m:StockName>IBM</m:StockName> </m:GetStockPrice> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>Technical critique Advantages Disadvantages

    Tags:Basic, Data, HTTP, Hypertext, Hypertext Transfer Protocol, JSON, Microsoft, SOAP, Universal, Universal Description Discovery and Integration, Web Services Description Language, Wikipedia, World Wide Web, World Wide Web Consortium, XML, XML-RPC


    Failed to connect to MySQL 1: Access denied for user 'foumanu'@'localhost' (using password: YES)